With regards to gas financial system, there is a debate about engine dimension vs. engine velocity. Is it higher to have a much bigger engine turning low RPMs or a small engine revving its coronary heart out? Just lately, the Rubbish Time YouTube channel tried to reply that age-old gas consumption query whereas attempting to eat 10 minutes of your time.
The video encompasses a 1996 Ford Falcon and a 1991 FSM Niki, a revised model of the Fiat 126 bought in Australia from 1989 to 1992. With the air-con on, the Falcon burns 15.7 liters of gas each 100 kilometers, the equal of about 15 mpg. As for the Niki, it does not have air-con. We’re additionally probably not certain what sort of fuel mileage it will get as a result of it retains breaking down. However with a tiny 650cc two-cylinder engine and a 1,300 lb curb weight, the Niki ought to thrash the Falcon in a battle of the least. If it stays working.
The race is straightforward, drive 100 km over a combination of roads whereas maintaining with site visitors. The Falcon cruises serenely, barely cracking 1,800 rpm. It by no means breaks a sweat, even on the freeway, simply maintaining with site visitors.
In line with Rubbish Time, driving the Niki flat out is like being in a “caged motorbike” or a “wheelbarrow for people.” Removed from highly effective, its two-cylinder engine thrashes simply to keep up velocity on the freeway, struggling valiantly to achieve the velocity restrict, earlier than settling again to 80 km/h (50 mph).
Finally the race ends, and the gas financial system scores are tallied. The Falcon manages a decent 10.77 liters per 100 km or nearly 22 mpg. Working flat out more often than not, the Niki burned 5.6 liters per 100 km, the equal of 42 mpg.
As for who actually wins, it could come all the way down to your choice. Would you reasonably spend extra on fuel to get someplace comfortably? Or, are you the sort of one who goes the most cost effective route potential or enjoys the feeling of driving a sluggish automobile quick?
