ICBC is responsible for the actions of certainly one of its former workers who offered buyer data to a felony gang, the B.C. Supreme Court docket determined Wednesday (Aug. 24).
The ruling means not less than 79 ICBC prospects and people residing with them could possibly be entitled to compensation from the insurance coverage company.
The category-action lawsuit was launched after a police investigation in August 2011 found an ICBC claims adjuster had offered buyer data to the member of a gang for about $25 apiece. 13 prospects subsequently had their properties and automobiles focused in taking pictures and arson assaults between April 2011 and January 2012.
All 13 had parked their automobiles at or close to the Justice Institute of B.C., which trains college students for jobs in policing, emergency administration, firefighting and safety, amongst others. One of many people discovered responsible of finishing up the assaults, Vincent Eric Gia-Hwa Cheung, mentioned he had a drug-induced paranoid perception that he was being focused and managed by the Justice Institute.
The worker, Sweet Elaine Rheaume, pleaded responsible to fraudulently acquiring a pc service and obtained a suspended sentence and 9 months’ probation.
The category-action lawsuit, nevertheless, is searching for monetary compensation from her employer.
In his Wednesday ruling, Justice Nathan Smith decided ICBC is vicariously liable, that means it’s answerable for Rheaume’s wrongful conduct regardless of not partaking in wrongful conduct itself. Smith discovered ICBC created the danger of wrongdoing, by giving Rheaume full entry to its numerous data information programs.
“ICBC had in place guidelines and insurance policies forbidding improper use of its databases, however the opportunity of a person worker selecting to disregard them was clearly foreseeable and there’s no proof of any system or methodology that might have prevented or detected that conduct on the time it occurred,” Smith wrote.
ICBC can be answerable for overlaying any damages awarded to class-action members, in addition to any property harm and bodily or psychological accidents sustained because of the breach. Precise quantities are but to be decided by the court docket.
@janeskrypnek
[email protected]
Like us on Fb and comply with us on Twitter.
BC Supreme CourtCourtICBCPrivacy
