Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Pictures
The Missouri Court docket of Appeals is siding with a lady who received a $5.2 million award in opposition to GEICO, in a case that facilities on a novel auto harm declare: the lady says she contracted a sexually transmitted illness in a Hyundai sedan whose proprietor was insured by GEICO.
The girl, recognized in court docket papers as M.O., says a person, recognized as M.B., contaminated her with human papillomavirus, or HPV, once they had unprotected intercourse in his 2014 Hyundai Genesis.
She says the person was negligent and did not inform her about his well being analysis, regardless of having a throat most cancers tumor that was confirmed to be optimistic for HPV.
GEICO had advised the lady its auto insurance coverage protection did not apply as a result of the “damages claimed didn’t come up out of the conventional use of the automobile.”
How did we get right here?
The sexual encounters occurred in late 2017. As a result of the automobile was lined by GEICO on the time, M.O. says the corporate is obligated to compensate her for contracting HPV from its proprietor within the automobile, citing medical bills and her ache and struggling.
The 2 signed an arbitration settlement in March of 2021, agreeing to settle their dispute. Roughly two months later, an arbitrator awarded M.O. $5.2 million, saying the sum “would pretty and justly compensate” her.
M.O. went to circuit court docket in Jackson County, Mo., to implement the arbitration ruling, and received her case. GEICO then appealed to the upper state court docket.
The insurance coverage large mentioned it hadn’t been given an opportunity to defend itself, violating its constitutional rights to due course of and entry to the courts. However in its ruling this week, two judges within the Missouri Court docket of Appeals’ western district mentioned GEICO had quite a few possibilities to behave by itself behalf.
The judges famous that M.O. had initially submitted a declare to GEICO greater than a yr in the past. And in February of 2021, the lady despatched the corporate a replica of the lawsuit she was about to file in opposition to the insured man. At the moment, she additionally provided to settle the declare for $1 million. The third choose on the appeals panel concurred with the court docket’s ruling, however he additionally mentioned GEICO hadn’t been given a “significant alternative to take part within the go well with” earlier than the judgment was rendered.
GEICO can also be combating the massive award in federal court docket
M.O. has now received three victories in Missouri. However in April of 2021, GEICO sued each M.O. and M.B. in federal court docket, asking the court docket to rule that the insurance coverage firm is not responsible for the lady being contaminated with HPV, and that it does not have an obligation to defend the person from her claims in opposition to him.
GEICO says the automobile proprietor’s claims for protection ought to be dismissed as a result of they’re barred by quite a few authorized doctrines, together with “fraud, collusion, illegality, laches, and unclean palms.”
However M.O. says GEICO acted in unhealthy religion, by refusing to defend the person who owns the automobile, regardless of a number of requests, and by refusing to settle her declare. She says the person “was insured in opposition to his private legal responsibility arising from his negligence in actions involving his vehicle,” and that makes GEICO accountable.
The federal case is ready for a jury trial, which is presently slated to start in a Kansas Metropolis courtroom in October. Since GEICO filed its federal go well with greater than a yr in the past, effectively over 100 docket entries have been made.