Need a compact automated SUV for the day by day metropolis grind? The Maruti Fronx AMT and Nissan Magnite AMT spell nice worth. We discover out which one is best.
Compact SUVs have develop into the go-to vehicles for the day by day metropolis grind. The compact measurement helps parking and manoeuvring, the excessive floor clearance helps navigate uprooted metropolis roads, and whereas these elements make a convincing case on their very own, what takes it a notch additional is the comfort of an automated gearbox. If you’re looking out for an automated compact SUV for round Rs 10 lakh, the Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT and the Nissan Magnite AMT will undoubtedly get your consideration. However which one is best?
Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: design
The Magnite is taller and squarer, making it appear larger.
When it comes to styling, each SUVs take a barely totally different strategy. Being primarily based on the Baleno hatchback, the Fronx doesn’t have a boxy stance, and though the cladding helps, it’s removed from wanting like an SUV. The Magnite, then again, is taller and squarer, making it appear larger. In dimensions, just a few millimetres separate the 2; the Fronx is barely longer, wider and has an extended wheelbase, whereas the Magnite is taller and has a better floor clearance (205mm vs 190mm). Each vehicles get LED headlamps and 16-inch alloy wheels, which is very commendable for the Fronx as it’s only obtainable within the Delta+ trim, not the top-spec Alpha.
Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: specs
Contained in the Fronx, unsurprisingly, it feels extra like a hatchback than an SUV. The sense of area isn’t all that nice, and because the driver’s seat misses out on peak regulate, the driving place is restricted. Nevertheless, the dashboard options a number of trims and panels that give it a contemporary really feel, and high quality is nice too. The inside of the Magnite feels extra SUV-like, the cabin is ethereal and the dashboard is ready additional away which helps support the sense of area. And whereas plastics and total high quality are first rate, they’re a shade behind what you get within the Fronx.
Contained in the cabin, the Fronx feels extra like a hatchback than an SUV.
That stated, you do get higher storage within the Magnite and correct bottle holders within the centre together with a centre armrest for the driving force. Storage within the Maruti is restricted to a small area underneath the HVAC panel, with the central cup holders being tiny. Consolation, nevertheless, is nice because of massive and accommodating seats which might be tender and supportive, whereas the Nissan has slimmer seats that aren’t as properly cushioned; driver-seat peak regulate makes up for the misplaced factors although.
Magnite’s inside high quality is a shade behind what you get within the Fronx.
The Magnite scores properly within the rear seat too, with spectacular roominess and a flat flooring that ensures even the centre passenger is snug. Nevertheless, there isn’t a headrest within the center and it solely will get a lap belt for security. Nevertheless, it does get rear AC vents, which the Fronx doesn’t. Headroom for tall passengers can be a problem within the Fronx, compounded by the tapering roofline, however legroom and kneeroom are good. The centre passenger does get their very own headrest and a three-point seat belt, nevertheless it’s too cramped, and three abreast is not going to be snug. Boot capability within the Fronx stands at 308 litres, which is lower than the 336 litres of the Magnite.
Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: options
On options, the Nissan is clearly forward: a 360-degree digicam, which is a giant plus in tight areas; a 6-speaker setup for higher audio; and keyless entry and go. The touchscreen on this Fronx Delta+ is a smaller 7-inch unit in comparison with the Magnite’s 8-inch, although each get wi-fi smartphone connectivity.
The Magnite will get a 360-degree digicam, which is exclusive for this worth level.
In terms of security, each get twin airbags, however the Magnite will get TPMS and has been rated 4 stars for grownup occupant security and three stars for little one occupant security within the outdated regime of World NCAP crash checks. The Fronx has not been examined by World NCAP but.
Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: powertrain, efficiency
The Fronx AMT is over 7 seconds faster to 100kph than the Magnite.
AMT fashions are sometimes proprietor pushed, so elements like efficiency and driveability do play a giant function. The Fronx will get a 1.2-litre, 4-cylinder petrol engine making 90hp, which is a complete lot greater than the 72hp from the 1.0-litre, 3-cylinder engine within the Magnite. Torque within the Fronx is best nonetheless, and the result’s unsurprising. In a 0-100kph sprint, the Fronx is over 7 seconds faster (13.70sec vs 20.71sec), and it’s a related story in terms of roll-on acceleration. The powertrain within the Magnite is simply too relaxed and a fast overtake requires numerous planning. Add to that the poor refinement, and the Magnite begins shedding out. AMTs usually are not anticipated to be as clean as CVTs or torque converters, however the Maruti unit is way extra refined and slicker with its shifts. Each vehicles additionally get guide modes for the gearbox, however actually, you’ve chosen the AMT for the automated comfort, and that’s what issues.
Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: trip, dealing with
Trip consolation on each SUVs is properly suited to damaged roads, however it’s the Fronx that edges forward with a bit extra suppleness; the Magnite is a tad firmer.
Round corners, the Magnite’s tall stance ends in a little bit of physique roll, whereas the Fronx stays flat and composed. The steering of each SUVs is mild and manoeuvrability is easy, though they’ll solely be adjusted for rake and never attain.
Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT vs Nissan Magnite AMT: verdict
Each SUVs have their strengths, and on paper a minimum of, it could appear the Magnite comes out on prime. It’s the extra sensible alternative, with extra inside and boot area, taller dimensions and better floor clearance. And with much more options at a cheaper price, it’s higher worth for cash too. Nevertheless, its sluggish and clunky powertrain is just too a lot of a compromise in a automobile that can primarily be proprietor pushed. The Fronx then again, is powered by Maruti’s confirmed and widespread 1.2 Ok-Collection engine, mated to a significantly better developed AMT, and also you’ll be happier behind its wheel. And whereas the Delta+ trim misses out on among the Magnite’s frills, it has the fundamentals lined. In the end, whereas the Nissan checks extra bins, it’s the better-rounded Maruti that we’d suggest.
Additionally see:
Maruti Suzuki Fronx long run evaluate, 5,000km report
Nissan Magnite AMT evaluate: Performs the worth card
Nissan Magnite AMT vs Maruti Suzuki Fronx AMT comparability video
