Two state troopers who had been struck by a automobile on an interstate exit ramp can’t accumulate damages for submit traumatic stress dysfunction, however one in all them can get better more cash as a result of his trial court docket award was improperly decreased by the Court docket of Appeals, the Connecticut Supreme Court docket dominated.
The excessive court docket on Wednesday reversed, partly, an appellate panel ruling that deducted the quantity {that a} state trooper recovered via a dram store declare from his private harm award, however upheld a discovering that rejected the trooper’s PTSD declare.
The court docket didn’t determine a bigger query as as to if accident victims can ever accumulate underinsured motorist advantages for PTSD, solely that two officers didn’t show that they really suffered from the dysfunction. Each the trial court docket choose and Court docket of Appeals dominated that uninsured motorist insurance coverage doesn’t cowl psychological accidents and in addition discovered that testimony from a counselor who handled the officers for PTSD was not credible.
“This court docket has just lately reiterated the proposition {that a} trier of reality could settle for or reject, in complete or partly, the testimony of an professional supplied by one social gathering,” the unanimous opinion says, citing two selections launched in 2021.
On the morning of Sept. 1, 2012, state trooper Darren Connolly pulled over a motorist he suspected of driving whereas intoxicated on Interstate 84 in Hartford. State troopers Scott Menard and Robert Zdrojeski additionally responded to the scene in separate automobiles.
Connolly and Menard had been standing on the aspect of the Sisson Avenue exit ramp behind the suspected drunk driver’s car when a car pushed by William Bowers struck Zdrojeski’s cruiser and pushed it ahead. Menard jumped out of the cruiser’s path and landed on his head. Connolly pushed used his proper arm to push himself off of the hood of the cruiser because it barreled ahead. Each males had been transported to a hospital and handled for accidents.
All three troopers filed claims towards an uninsured motorist insurance coverage coverage that the state carries as a requirement of its collective bargaining settlement with the Connecticut State Police union. In addition they obtained staff’ compensation advantages and filed Dram Store Act claims.
Every of the three officers claimed they developed PTSD on account of the accident. They had been all handled by the identical counselor: Jennifer Honen, who is just not a psychologist however has a grasp’s diploma in psychological counseling.
The state rejected the claims, contending that uninsured motorist insurance coverage covers solely bodily harm, not psychological issues. The officers filed a lawsuit towards the state and in addition filed claims beneath the Dram Store Act, which imposes strict legal responsibility on institutions that serve alcohol to intoxicated individuals who injure others due to their intoxication.
(Dram store is an archaic time period for a enterprise that sells liquor by the “dram,” which is the same as one-eighth of a fluid ounce.)
Of their lawsuit towards the state, the officers requested $1 million in damages for Menard and $889,000 for Connolly. The trial court docket, nonetheless, dominated that Honen’s testimony was not credible as a result of she didn’t do any screening to confirm that their claims of emotional misery had been authentic.
The trial court docket in the end awarded Menard $172,000 in damages and Connolly $187,000, however decreased these awards by the quantity of staff’ compensation advantages that had been paid. That left Menard with no harm award and Connolly with solely $32,905.67.
Every of the three troopers additionally had been paid an extra $83,333 via settlements of their Dram Store Act claims. The trial court docket didn’t deduct these funds from the award.
Menard and Connolly appealed the choice and the state filed a cross-appeal for all three awards. A 3-judge panel dominated that the trial court docket ought to have additionally deducted the quantity every officer obtained via the Dram Store Act claims. That decreased every trooper’s award to zero.
Menard and Connolly appealed to the Supreme Court docket.
The excessive court docket rejected the state troopers’ argument that the trial court docket had arbitrarily determined that Honen’s testimony was not credible. Honen had conceded that she had not reviewed any outdoors sources to substantiate the troopers’ accounts of the incident, despite the fact that psychologists have customary assessments that can be utilized to find out if a affected person is mendacity. She additionally admitted that she was unaware that Connolly had given an inaccurate description of the accident by saying he had been “run over.”
The excessive court docket affirmed the portion of the ruling that rejected the PTSD claims, however discovered that the Court docket of Appeals erred when it decreased the harm awards by the quantity of the Dram Store Act funds obtained.
The Supreme Court docket stated Dram Store Act settlements are expressly excluded from the statutory definition of collateral sources for functions of non-public harm lawsuits.
The Supreme Court docket reversed the Court docket of Appeals judgment, partly, and remanded the case with an instruction to reinstate the the trial court docket’s $32,905.67 award to Connolly.
The excessive court docket didn’t handle the query of whether or not plaintiffs could be compensated for PTSD via uninsured motorist advantages, because the Court docket of Appeals asserted, leaving a key query unresolved by the case.
Wish to keep updated?
Get the newest insurance coverage information
despatched straight to your inbox.
