What makes a automotive quick? Typically, extra energy means extra go, however again in 1982, energy was onerous to come back by. Weight issues too, however not as a lot as you may assume, no less than for the automobiles examined by Shopper Information again in 1982. In contrast to earlier “quickest” lists I’ve put collectively, I’ve included the ultimate drive ratio for every automotive listed beneath.
A low (numerically excessive) final-drive ratio implies that the engine spins extra occasions relative to the drive axle than it would have been a excessive remaining drive ratio employed. Thus, the engine revs extra rapidly, and its torque is multiplied correspondingly. Predictably, the low remaining drive ratio may even harm freeway gasoline economic system, except an overdrive prime transmission gear is accessible.
Be aware how effectively the smaller-engine automobiles proven beneath carried out. Most have low final-drive ratios and 5-speed handbook transmissions–a fantastic mixture for efficiency and economic system.
All of the numbers listed beneath have been extracted from Shopper Information: Auto Take a look at ’82. As for the asterisk above: Shopper Information didn’t check each car accessible on the market in 1982, nor each model of these it did consider. The automobiles seen listed here are the 15 quickest that rolled by means of the CG workplace in 1982.
Additionally, full confession: I prolonged this checklist to fifteen automobiles from our regular ten or 12 as a result of I actually needed to incorporate the Mitsubishi-built Dodge Challenger and the Isuzu i-Mark on the checklist. Is that improper?
Mannequin-12 months Insanity! 15 Sporty Automotive Advertisements from 1984
The 15 Quickest Automobiles of 1982
Chevrolet Corvette: 7.5 Seconds (0-60 mph)
Engine: 200-horsepower 5.7-liter V8
Transmission: 4-speed computerized
Weight (kilos): 3368
Remaining Drive Ratio: 2.87
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 16.8-to-1
The ten Quickest Automobiles of 1973*
Datsun 280ZX Turbo: 8.0 Seconds
Engine: 180-horsepower turbocharged 2.8-liter six
Transmission: 3-speed computerized
Weight (kilos): 2867
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.54
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 15.9-to-1
The 12 Quickest Automobiles of 1983*
Toyota Celica Supra: 8.7 Seconds
Engine: 145-horsepower 2.8-liter six
Transmission: 4-speed computerized
Weight (kilos): 2932
Remaining Drive Ratio: 4.10
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 20.2-to-1
12 Quickest Automobiles of 1984*
Mazda RX-7: 9.0 Seconds
Engine: 100-horsepower 1.3-liter twin-rotor Wankel
Transmission: 5-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 2362
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.90
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 23.6-to-1
The ten Quickest Automobiles of 1981*
Porsche 924 Turbo: 9.5 Seconds
Engine: 154-horsepower 2.0-liter turbocharged 4
Transmission: 5-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 2850
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.89
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 18.5-to-1
The ten Quickest Automobiles of 1980*
BMW 733i: 9.8 Seconds
Engine: 174-horsepower 3.2-liter six
Transmission: 5-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 3590
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.45
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 20.6-to-1
The 9 Quickest Automobiles of 1972*
Chevrolet Quotation X-11: 10.0 Seconds
Engine: 135-horsepower 2.8-liter V6
Transmission: 4-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 2700
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.65
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 20.0-to-1
The ten Quickest Automobiles of 1971*
Pontiac Firebird Trans Am: 10.5 Seconds
Engine: 145-horsepower 5.0-liter V8
Transmission: 3-speed computerized
Weight (kilos): 3125
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.23
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 21.6-to-1
The ten Slowest Automobiles of 1973*
Audi Coupe GT: 11.1 Seconds
Engine: 100-horsepower 2.1-liter five-cylinder
Transmission: 5-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 2507
Remaining Drive Ratio: 4.46
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 25.1-to-1
The 12 Slowest Automobiles of 1983*
Jaguar XJ6: 11.2 Seconds
Engine: 176-horsepower 4.2-liter six
Transmission: 3-speed computerized
Weight (kilos): 4050
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.07
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 23.0-to-1
5 Most-Highly effective American Automobiles of 1980
Volkswagen Rabbit: 11.2 Seconds
Engine: 74-horsepower 1.7-liter 4
Transmission: 5-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 1825
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.89
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 24.7-to-1
5 Most-Highly effective American Automobiles of 1977
Isuzu i-Mark: 11.3 Seconds
Engine: 78-horsepower 1.8-liter 4
Transmission: 5-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 2260
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.31
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 29.0-to-1
7 Most-Highly effective Japanese Automobiles of 1981
Dodge Challenger: 11.5 Seconds
Engine: 100-horsepower, 2.6-liter 4
Transmission: 5-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 2756
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.30
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 27.6-to-1
5 Most-Highly effective American Automobiles of 1991
Dodge Charger 2.2: 11.5 Seconds
Engine: 84-horsepower 2.2-liter 4
Transmission: 4-speed handbook
Weight (kilos): 2310
Remaining Drive Ratio: 3.13
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 27.5-to-1
Downpour Insanity! Traditional Automotive Advertisements That includes Automobiles within the Rain
Buick Skylark: 12.0 Seconds
Engine: 135-horsepower 2.8-liter V6
Transmission: 3-speed computerized
Weight (kilos): 2588
Remaining Drive Ratio: 2.97
Energy-to-Weight Ratio (lbs./hp): 19.2-to-1
Take heed to the Shopper Information Automotive Stuff Podcast
Quickest Automobiles of 1982 Gallery
(Click on beneath for enlarged photographs)
Quickest Automobiles of 1982
The Sporty Compacts of 1970
Quickest Automobiles of 1982